• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Isn’t that still with car lanes? or are those taxi/bus lanes? Anyhow, better than before.

  • gergo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    i know I’ll get downvoted for this and i know the environmental impact, and i know this is beside the point, but 70s car design was so much better than today’s.

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think there’s room to appreciate the aesthetics of past eras while still being anti-car in the present - nothing wrong with that

  • VonReposti@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Great improvement but they still got a long way to go. Still an asphalt desert. One-way bike lane seems like weird choice too and having them in the middle of the street makes it harder to add protective measures. But then again I don’t know if this is just the first step to a bike and pedestrian friendly street. The minimum IMO is a raised curb between cars and bikes in a low-speed zone. If there’s street parking the parked cars can act as a natural protective barrier.

      • VonReposti@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair enough, I might be a bit too harsh since the bike paths in Denmark are among the best. The square looks nice.

        And I am always harsh when it comes to a lack of green in city centers, Denmark is very bad at that :p Could be worse but how hard is it to plant a line of trees down a boulevard that has already reclaimed some space from cars?

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Do you mean the gutter and drain? On the road that went from pavement to asphalt?