What a shit article, basically just an ad* for her upcoming movie.
The titles is all the info on it, they donāt actually talk about the bad ideas. I should have known better.
Edit: hereās the whole article actually, fuck that website, it doesnāt deserve clicks.
Text
Scarlett Johansson told the Los Angeles Times on her āPaper Tigerā press tour that she sometimes gets acting offers from major Hollywood studios that leave her questioning why the movie is even being made. The Oscar nomineeās studio output in recent years has been dominated by her role as Black Widow in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Her last Hollywood tentpole was 2025ās āJurassic World Rebirth.ā
āAm I making something that other people want to see? Is there an audience for this movie? Iām not making a movie just for me,ā Johansson said about the thought process behind selecting roles. āSometimes I get studio projects that I have to say, āI donāt think you should make this. I donāt know who youāre making this for. It seems irresponsible to make this.āā
While her latest release, āPaper Tiger,ā is an independent drama (it was picked up by Neon shortly before its world premiere at the Cannes Film Festival earlier this year), Johansson spent much of this year shooting back-to-back studio tentpoles āThe Exorcist: Martyrsā (in theaters March 12, 2027) and āThe Batman 2ā (Feb. 18, 2028). Next up in her production schedule is āScapegoat,ā the new movie from āMidsommarā and āEddingtonā filmmaker Ari Aster. The project is backed by A24 and co-stars Jude Law.
āI donāt know what it is either,ā Johansson told the Times about the movie. āIāll have more information for you after a few weeks. The script is just so intense. It has this immediacy to it that is really different. Iāve never read anything like it before. [My husband] was like, āWhat are you reading?ā Because I kept going, āOh, my God!āā
Johansson did not name which studio offers were total busts, but she has been open in previous interviews about the studio movies she desperately wanted. One such movie was Alfonso Cuarónās āGravityā (the role went to Sandra Bullock) and another was āIron Man 2ā (Emily Blunt originally landed the role of Black Widow but had to drop out due to scheduling conflicts). In a previous Variety interview, Johansson cited losing out on both movies as the moment she went into crisis mode as an actor.
āI got turned down for two roles ā the first was āIron Man 2ā and then the other one was āGravity,āā Johansson said. āI had wanted that role so much. It was sort of the straw that broke the camelās back. I felt really frustrated and hopeless. Like, āAm I doing the right job?ā The work I was being offered felt deeply unfulfilling. I think I was offered every Marilyn Monroe script ever. I was like, āIs this the end of the road creatively?āā
Johansson has long traded off major Hollywood studio movies with edgier indie fare. Sheās moving into shooting Asterās āScapegoatā after wrapping production on the Warner Bros.-backed āThe Batman 2,ā her role in which remains a mystery.
āIt was very hard to figure out,ā Johansson told āEntertainment Tonightā earlier this month about the superhero sequel. āI donāt know why, whether it was just the role or it was just where I am in my life, but it was just hard to crack it. And thatās all I can say about it.ā
Variety is a mouthpiece for Hollywood. Theyāve been shitting on Gunnās Superman for the last few weeks.
Jesus, really? That movie was great.
Amazing how many different articles they were able to produce that all said the exact same thing about Gunn.
Gotta manufacture consent for the popular director being kicked off his popular project for any other reason than his antizionist position.
just an add
āadā, right?
Fixed it!
Scarlett: Not all movie offers are good.
Variety: surprised Pikachu face
Nice Cage: Iāll do it!
Nope, Cage has a spine, he rightly gave Amazon the middle finger
And then he got himself cast as John Madden, he doesnāt sound like Madden at all just fat nic cage.
The strength of his spine is inversely related to the amount of debt he currently carries.
Did they ask him to make Space Ass?
They demanded AI rights after Spider-Noir and he walked out.
Nah. Itās why Spider Noir was killed, I think. Nic Cage wouldnāt roll over.
Nice
āScarlett Johansson Learns About Sturgeonās Lawā
Says the woman who said yes to being the face of genocide soda?
No one knows wtf youāre talking about.
Cruise on, Internet warrior.She left Oxfam (the human rights charity) after they criticized her for working with a company that set up illegal factories in the West Bank. She fully stood by her decision and said thereās no right or wrong side of the issue.
Itās ok to not know about something, but itās certainly a take to act holier than thou about not knowing it. Most people on Lemmy seem to be pretty aware of the genocide in Gaza and the celebrities that have worked with companies perpetuating it. Her and Paltrow are some pretty mainstream high profile ones that generally come up often because of their involvement with Marvel, especially in contrast to other Marvel actors who have actively campaigned for a ceasefire and more aid (Ruffalo, Hiddleston, Comberbatch, some spideys, Olsen).
There are obviously a bunch of other celebs that have supported the genocide, and others that stand against it, but Iām just listing some off the top of my head.
Itās ok to not know about something, but itās certainly a take to act holier than thou about not knowing it.
Oxfam (the human rights charity)
I appreciate you highlighting that there are issues with Oxfam, but I donāt think my statements are really contradictory there.
Per the wiki page you linked:
Working with thousands of local partner organizations, we work with people living in poverty striving to exercise theirĀ human rights, assert theirĀ dignityĀ as full citizens and take control of their lives
Iām not saying itās the worlds best charity, or even a good one, and Iām not the one who decided to be an ambassador for it. I just noted that they are a human rights charity and apparently she aligned with them enough to want to be their ambassador, but was no longer interested when she faced criticism from them over a brand deal with a BDS company.
If their controversy section makes you believe they should not be referred to as a human rights charity, please let me know what you feel would be more appropriate in this context.
It was less the contradiction and more the calling out of an āholier than thouā attitude while also holding up oxfam as a foil,
Though on a more thorough read it seems more like i misunderstood why the reference was there, so i rescind my reply , with apologies.
Iām not saying itās the worlds best charity, or even a good one, and Iām not the one who decided to be an ambassador for it. I just noted that they are a human rights charity and apparently she aligned with them enough to want to be their ambassador, but was no longer interested when she faced criticism from them over a brand deal with a BDS company.
Fair
If their controversy section makes you believe they should not be referred to as a human rights charity, please let me know what you feel would be more appropriate in this context.
Iām not the arbiter of what people are allowed to call something, i personally consider oxfam to be a corporation disguised as a charity but i wouldnāt try and force anyone to adhere to my opinion on that.
I would however use what i consider supporting evidence of my opinion as a foundation for an argument, as it evident.
Ultimately ācharityā is technically correct, i canāt think of a more appropriate title that isnāt forcing my opinion.
Ok. Whatās the genocide soda?
SodaStream
Eh, Iām a cherry Pepsi guy. No idea what stream soda is.
PepsiCo own Sodastream, https://www.voanews.com/a/pepsico-buys-israel-s-sodastream-for-3-2-billion/4536177.html
Wolf Cola?
SodaStream, a company headquartered in Israel, with a controversial factory in a settlement on the West Bank.
The actress stepped down from her role withĀ OxfamĀ a month ago, when the international relief organisation wrote to her criticising her decision to sign a contract with the maker of carbonated drink machines.
I think thatās something thatās very easily debatable ⦠And thereās no right side or wrong side leaning on this issue.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/mar/16/scarlett-johansson-stands-by-sodastream-deal
Owned by Pepsico. I guess they were jealous of Coca cola buying the nazi soda (fanta)








