• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    Ā·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    What a shit article, basically just an ad* for her upcoming movie.

    The titles is all the info on it, they don’t actually talk about the bad ideas. I should have known better.

    Edit: here’s the whole article actually, fuck that website, it doesn’t deserve clicks.

    Text

    Scarlett Johansson told the Los Angeles Times on her ā€œPaper Tigerā€ press tour that she sometimes gets acting offers from major Hollywood studios that leave her questioning why the movie is even being made. The Oscar nominee’s studio output in recent years has been dominated by her role as Black Widow in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Her last Hollywood tentpole was 2025’s ā€œJurassic World Rebirth.ā€

    ā€œAm I making something that other people want to see? Is there an audience for this movie? I’m not making a movie just for me,ā€ Johansson said about the thought process behind selecting roles. ā€œSometimes I get studio projects that I have to say, ā€˜I don’t think you should make this. I don’t know who you’re making this for. It seems irresponsible to make this.ā€™ā€

    While her latest release, ā€œPaper Tiger,ā€ is an independent drama (it was picked up by Neon shortly before its world premiere at the Cannes Film Festival earlier this year), Johansson spent much of this year shooting back-to-back studio tentpoles ā€œThe Exorcist: Martyrsā€ (in theaters March 12, 2027) and ā€œThe Batman 2ā€ (Feb. 18, 2028). Next up in her production schedule is ā€œScapegoat,ā€ the new movie from ā€œMidsommarā€ and ā€œEddingtonā€ filmmaker Ari Aster. The project is backed by A24 and co-stars Jude Law.

    ā€œI don’t know what it is either,ā€ Johansson told the Times about the movie. ā€œI’ll have more information for you after a few weeks. The script is just so intense. It has this immediacy to it that is really different. I’ve never read anything like it before. [My husband] was like, ā€˜What are you reading?’ Because I kept going, ā€˜Oh, my God!ā€™ā€

    Johansson did not name which studio offers were total busts, but she has been open in previous interviews about the studio movies she desperately wanted. One such movie was Alfonso Cuarón’s ā€œGravityā€ (the role went to Sandra Bullock) and another was ā€œIron Man 2ā€ (Emily Blunt originally landed the role of Black Widow but had to drop out due to scheduling conflicts). In a previous Variety interview, Johansson cited losing out on both movies as the moment she went into crisis mode as an actor.

    ā€œI got turned down for two roles — the first was ā€˜Iron Man 2’ and then the other one was ā€˜Gravity,ā€™ā€ Johansson said. ā€œI had wanted that role so much. It was sort of the straw that broke the camel’s back. I felt really frustrated and hopeless. Like, ā€˜Am I doing the right job?’ The work I was being offered felt deeply unfulfilling. I think I was offered every Marilyn Monroe script ever. I was like, ā€˜Is this the end of the road creatively?ā€™ā€

    Johansson has long traded off major Hollywood studio movies with edgier indie fare. She’s moving into shooting Aster’s ā€œScapegoatā€ after wrapping production on the Warner Bros.-backed ā€œThe Batman 2,ā€ her role in which remains a mystery.

    ā€œIt was very hard to figure out,ā€ Johansson told ā€œEntertainment Tonightā€ earlier this month about the superhero sequel. ā€œI don’t know why, whether it was just the role or it was just where I am in my life, but it was just hard to crack it. And that’s all I can say about it.ā€

  • sidebro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    Ā·
    19 hours ago

    Scarlett: Not all movie offers are good.

    Variety: surprised Pikachu face

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        Ā·
        14 hours ago

        She left Oxfam (the human rights charity) after they criticized her for working with a company that set up illegal factories in the West Bank. She fully stood by her decision and said there’s no right or wrong side of the issue.

        It’s ok to not know about something, but it’s certainly a take to act holier than thou about not knowing it. Most people on Lemmy seem to be pretty aware of the genocide in Gaza and the celebrities that have worked with companies perpetuating it. Her and Paltrow are some pretty mainstream high profile ones that generally come up often because of their involvement with Marvel, especially in contrast to other Marvel actors who have actively campaigned for a ceasefire and more aid (Ruffalo, Hiddleston, Comberbatch, some spideys, Olsen).

        There are obviously a bunch of other celebs that have supported the genocide, and others that stand against it, but I’m just listing some off the top of my head.

          • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            10 hours ago

            I appreciate you highlighting that there are issues with Oxfam, but I don’t think my statements are really contradictory there.

            Per the wiki page you linked:

            Working with thousands of local partner organizations, we work with people living in poverty striving to exercise theirĀ human rights, assert theirĀ dignityĀ as full citizens and take control of their lives

            I’m not saying it’s the worlds best charity, or even a good one, and I’m not the one who decided to be an ambassador for it. I just noted that they are a human rights charity and apparently she aligned with them enough to want to be their ambassador, but was no longer interested when she faced criticism from them over a brand deal with a BDS company.

            If their controversy section makes you believe they should not be referred to as a human rights charity, please let me know what you feel would be more appropriate in this context.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              Ā·
              8 hours ago

              It was less the contradiction and more the calling out of an ā€œholier than thouā€ attitude while also holding up oxfam as a foil,

              Though on a more thorough read it seems more like i misunderstood why the reference was there, so i rescind my reply , with apologies.

              I’m not saying it’s the worlds best charity, or even a good one, and I’m not the one who decided to be an ambassador for it. I just noted that they are a human rights charity and apparently she aligned with them enough to want to be their ambassador, but was no longer interested when she faced criticism from them over a brand deal with a BDS company.

              Fair

              If their controversy section makes you believe they should not be referred to as a human rights charity, please let me know what you feel would be more appropriate in this context.

              I’m not the arbiter of what people are allowed to call something, i personally consider oxfam to be a corporation disguised as a charity but i wouldn’t try and force anyone to adhere to my opinion on that.

              I would however use what i consider supporting evidence of my opinion as a foundation for an argument, as it evident.

              Ultimately ā€œcharityā€ is technically correct, i can’t think of a more appropriate title that isn’t forcing my opinion.