Linux Distro Finder
unknownuniverse.uk
The Linux ecosystem is vast, fragmented, and notoriously opinionated. That is precisely why I built an interactive Linux Distro Finder.
  • cadekat@pawb.social
    1·
    14 hours ago

    I haven’t used Arch in a long time, but from what I remember…

    Arch and Gentoo are both rolling releases, but Gentoo is rolling stable while Arch is bleeding edge.

    If you game, you can’t beat being able to drop kernel patches in a folder and have them applied on every update. Works for all packages, not just the kernel.

    GURU has a bit more oversight than the AUR, but not as many packages.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      2·
      13 hours ago

      I’m thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

      • I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven’t broken my system in a decade, seems like it’s fine for personal use anyway.
      • I don’t need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
      • The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

      Still, I’m curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        2·
        4 hours ago

        You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

        I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

        I’ve never contributed to the AUR, so I can’t really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

        That’s completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3