• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, not ok. Lynching and torture is reprehensible. So is the death penalty.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lynching is okay, if it’s ppl who got above the law (like dictators or corrupt police/judges) and it has been tried to do it by the book first. It must stay a rare exception.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        You may accept it in that case but shouldn’t glorify or advertise for it, in my opinion. I get that I am in the minority here, but human rights are unsaleable, in my opinion.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I 100% agree. The violation of human rights for any individual, no matter the cause, undermines the sanctity of human rights for all.

          He should have healthcare and safety in prison.

          • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            They should have, but unfortunately you can’t put someone in prison who made every crime they did legal or controls/influences the prison or it’s staff. They will probably be busted out long before they would go to the prison and then disappear anyone who tried to imprison them.