• DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    there’s a very good reason why humans absolutely dominate every animal on earth - our intelligence

    Gonna have to slight disagree on this one. I’ve always found out ability to organize and communicate in generalist situations to be far more valuable than individual intelligence (though that’s also nothing to shrug at compared to other animals).

    Naw, part of me is wondering if you’d be more likely to succeed in a 1-on-1 with the knife or a 3-on-1 unarmed. I still can’t think of a good strategy, but I feel like wed stand a better chance that just any one of us out there.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      “organize and communicate in generalist situations”

      So, intelligence? Humans didn’t develop big brains for playing chess and doing theoretical physics, and most animal species that are considered “smart” are social (e.g. crows, most whales).

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Eh, yes?

        Feels like a different flavor of “intelligence” since one is problem solving focused (“how do a beat an unbearable for with minimal gear”) while the other is waiting for “triggers” and having “responses” ready (“I’m at my spot and need to wait for guy #2 to run past to drop the anvil”) and then not freezing if one of the triggers is slightly off.

        So anyway, in general, both probably count as intelligence, but in this specific case, I think its worth differentiating one from the other. The best organizer/team player is not gonna stand out when working alone, while the most intelligent problem solver may not be able to work on a team.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, but the thing is, humans dominate every known animal in both. The way primitive humans (probably) lived, they needed to be both competent at individual problem solving and group coordination.

          But fair, it’s quite telling that this “human vs. t-rex” problem isn’t presented as a group effort, but as “one vs. one”. Many modern humans have deluded themselves into thinking that the greatest people work alone.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lol, not the intention.

        I’m thinking of trying to start some kind of rope making operation in the hut (VERY wild card assumption that the resources for this would be available). If you and your two buddies could make enough rope to hog tie the Rex, then successfully did the thing while it slept, maybe you could also build some level of choker for it to suffocate the beast?

        Idk, but I know that’d be a lot of rope. Gotta get multiple people on the task.

        • Axeman666@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That might work. You could probably use multiple people to set up a trap and bait the beast in. There are definitely more options when you have more people to work with.