I’ll start it off:

  • Windows is a perfectly fine OS, as long as you use Enterprise or Server (Home and Pro are crap)
  • Self driving cars are the future since the US won’t fully embrace mass transit
  • rowansprig@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Sure… but I’d like for them to make some sort of amends for stealing all the content on the internet to make it?

    And I’d like content made by AI to have that declared so consumers can support human artists and avoid grifters.

    • josephc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s interesting to see the collision of academic mindsets with the proliferation of AI. I largely agree with you: if something uses public data it should be offered as a public good.

      It makes sense to me why it happened, though. Growing up, I always had the expectation that the stuff I put on the Internet would be there forever and basically used in ways that I wouldn’t expect. I didn’t feel the need to tell people what they could and could not learn from my posts and whatever tiny amount of learning I impart on a person feels perfectly analogous to whatever tiny amount of weight updates I’ll provide to a model.

      Academia felt very similar to me. We put out papers because we found the subjects interesting. We didn’t make money from them (public funding) and people would build things on what we learned. It felt like a good model. Everyone shares the knowledge.

      My biggest beef with AI isn’t that they trained on the Internet, it’s that they trained on the Internet and kept the result for themselves.