As far as i know, communism from an origin and tought as it on the theoretical plane has TWO Big problems and those are:
- Comunism tends to not know what actually is needed to produce
in a capital-less society, being, on this ideal no money, nobody can’t really say what its needed, when, and how, hey maybe democracy can do a rough equivalent to that BUT not as good,decentralized and acurate as money itself.
- Comunism has a problem on incentives
Incentives, can be divided into by benefit,you can get something by doing other stuff, or you do that other stuff in hopes of avoiding a not so agradable scenario.
The thing is that communism, being a stateless, and buisnessless society on its end goal, only has to incentives, happy chemicals for doing something, its a matter that fullfils you or you directly need or social pressure, either good or bad, there is no other ,mostly, third way.
So I want to know wether how could it work in a modern,globalized society and how those two problems can be solved or not and on the how of the posible solution.
Btw, I want to know if im being rude or something,and my english is not that good but im genuinelly curious about how the left can solve these problems.
Charging money for things is not a prerequisite to tracking which things are being acquired. You’d still have something roughly equivalent to stores in a moneyless society, because things still need to get from the people who make them to the people who use them. It’s inconvenient and inefficient for individuals to go to a bunch of different farms for different foods, different factories to get different tools, and so on instead of each farm and factory loading giant quantities onto trains and shipping them to centralized places.
Look up Catalonia during the most recent Spanish civil war. Incentives aren’t nearly the problem that most people assume they are. Those happy chemicals actually work quite well.