• insanemantis@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The injuries were related to the dog’s job

    That’s like if people work at a candy factory and they keep injuring their thumbs on the blade of the candy making machine, but instead of making the machine safer we just cut off their thumbs

    Humans are so violent like jfc

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      These dogs weren’t running factories they were chasing vermin and helping in hunting. The wild animal will fight, but both jobs were necessary for survival and impossible to redesign at the time.

      But we have invented new ways meaning that dogs are no longer required for these jobs. This should have been when docking was abandoned

      • insanemantis@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m going a step further, because you know tail docking is as old as 2,000 years ago? People didn’t even know that animals felt pain

        I don’t know much about the details, but here’s what makes me suspicious: didn’t dogs already chase and hunt before domestication?

        And, you’re telling me that only after humans make a job out of it, it becomes something that injures their tails?

        This is why the factory analogy starts to make sense, because clearly there is something that was put in place, that we imposed on the dogs. Something changed, from the wilderness to their jobs, that make chasing and hunting less safe for them

        And instead of doing the responsible thing and making it safe by idk, fixing the thing that injures their tails? No, no too hard, no let’s just fucking cut off the entire thing

        I mean that’s just so dramatic and cruel. There had to be a better way