I stumbled upon a post that tells about a project not by the author, and the project has signs of AI. The post is clearly saying the project is good, so I interpreted it as a promotion, but maybe I am wrong. Should that kind of post still be marked as [AIP] ?
The post is https://lemmy.world/post/52316345
Just like the discussion last time on this - every user will not be able to be a forensic reviewer.
This is demonstrated clearly with how you misunderstood the role of the agents.md file in the other thread, that was for AI to be used with the app, not for the app development.
So if you’d like to propose this, and people would like this, you’re going to need to include how or its simply unworkable as a rule. And I don’t see any option for how this could be realistically implemented.
Edit: autocorrect messed with the first sentence, corrected.
I wish it would because there’s no way to stop someone from creating an alt to promote their own projects and claim “they didn’t know it was AI” when they knew full well it was.
It’s kind of funny how much people have to lie just to use a stupid tool. either you’re proud of using it and will stand by your decision to use it, or you don’t use it at all and don’t need to worry about backlash.
IMO I think it would benefit both this community and those who want to use AI if there was a completely different community to post AI developed projects on.
they win because nobody will shit on their posts, and we win because nobody has to read slop.
I wish it would because there’s no way to stop someone from creating an alt to promote their own projects and claim “they didn’t know it was AI” when they knew full well it was.
They will have to wait 30 days every time. This hasn’t been an issue for any post so far.
