I worked in a developing country for three years. Women’s breasts were not considered private. As a result, I saw breasts frequently. By about month two, a uncovered female breast was about as interesting to me as her elbow. There’s no reason to sexualize the breast. They are baby-feeding organs. Not to go all Freud on you, but I wonder if it’s a remnant of the breast-feeding positive feelings.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    “there’s nothing sexual about breasts”

    I never understand this opinion. Do you expect me to feel bad for getting aroused by breasts? Do you expect me to try and change that about myself? Do you expect me to explain it academically and defend it like a view that requires an argument?

    If there wasn’t anything sexual about breasts, it doesn’t seem like people would get aroused by them. Simple as that.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Context matters and self control exists. Yes, boobs can be arousing but if just seeing a random boob in public gives you a boner there might indeed be something wrong with you.

      Hell, gynaecologist and a doctor doing beast exams look at boobs and even vaginas all day and they manage not be constantly horny.

      Get your shit together.

    • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Only people in a handful of Western countries get aroused by them. Remember, men in western countries used to get aroused by ankles.

      • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is an extremely silly statement. People can and will be aroused by anything. Some people like feet. Feet are definitely not a sex organ. Some people get turned on by biceps. Some people really like legs. Definitely doesn’t need to be a sex organ to arouse someone.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Only people in a handful of Western countries get aroused by them

        That absolutely cannot be true. Is Japan western, for example?

        Remember, men in western countries used to get aroused by ankles.

        Um, yeah that would be because they’d seen nothing more. Are you really implying they wouldn’t have been aroused by breasts??

        In any case, “breasts aren’t sexy, billions of people are wrong” is a bad take. Maybe you win this community.