• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    It’s always just which ever is the biggest. They need to have two big ones the same size.

    Science needs to resolve this question for both gas and electric. Is bigger always better? Or is it like how things thaw slower in hot water?

    EDIT: my oven is electric guys, so I think I can go small pot, on BIG burner. But is that better? Probably.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I rarely need the biggest burner, and the gas valves only go so low (to avoid accidental extinguishing) so i tend to use smaller ones. Full chat on the biggest one will incinerate most food!

    • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      depends on target temperature, and how much gradient from internal to external temperature is acceptable. high heat will cook the outside much faster than the inside, which is fine for something like rare steak with a seared outside and relatively low core temp, but cooking chicken the same way will have the outside completely dry and charred by the time the core gets where it needs to be. lower heat gives more time for heat to spread all the way through, so the difference between core temp and surface temp is less

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Small pan, small burner. It’s not that deep. Having flames licking up the side on a big burner is wasteful and more dangerous

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Is bigger always better?

      Bigger pot, bigger burner. Smaller pot, smaller burner. It’s not complicated – just use the one that best matches the size of the cookware you’re using.