they always end the comment with some sort of wry contrast.

I do not consider this kind of preaching to the choir constructive at all: it oversimplifies any nuance in articles posted into building the echo chamber. what’s constructive for discussion should be what challenges!

The third screenshot is me asking if it was written by AI and not receiving a reply. The user pretty much does not reply to people, just obviously-LLM summaries to his own posts. Almost all such comments are the same amount of lines. I used the first result for an LLM detector just to give a number; Eicker’s language always ticks the “this is LLM” neurons to me.

that’s not UX