2·
11 hours agoOf course, but he does seem to take it to a whole new level. He’s not proudly stupid, he clearly thinks he’s smarter than everyone else.
Blakey [he/him]
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
Cake day: July 29th, 2020
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Jerma iirc is openly gay and shad is a homophobic dickbag so that scans. I think this is just a lesson about the nature of Australians who convert to Mormonism:p
I was gonna mention the AI art arc! Hasn’t he cut his own brother off over it because he said, basically, that generating an image is not the same as doing art?
I mean it’s far and away the least stupid and offensive thing the guy has done in years. That shitty novel he crapped out all by itself should get him… Some kind of repercussions, anyway. Definitely check the little freak’s hard drives too, because some of the shit his obvious self insert MC gets up to is extremely fucking gross.
God, shad is fucking wild. I kinda wish I didn’t know about him but I have slurped up so many dumb YouTube videos about this awful little worm of a man.
I’m never going to read his book but the descriptions of it are absolutely appalling. Main character is supposed to be “dark and edgy”, and is also obviously a self insert. Full of sexual violence against girls.
Description of a horrible book including references to said SV.
Apparently by the end of the book, all of the ones who he managed to impregnate forgive him, while the ones he didn’t remain “bitter”. He also does nothing to actually earn forgiveness, continues to carry out sexual violence during his supposed redemption arc, and becomes a magical “superhero” vigilante who murders people in the streets, which is okay because he can look into them and see how much “light” they have which tells him whether or not they are redeemable. The only slight problem with this is that he apparently forgot that’s how it worked at some point and also wrote that your “light” is more a reflection of how sure you are of yourself. So the “hero” is merking people in the street for the great crime of self doubt.
It’s just… Wild how bizarrely awful and offensive it all is. There’s so much weird shit he has gotten up to. He absolutely lost his shit publicly over princess peach wearing pants in the Mario movie, because “it’s not feminine, she’s a princess and would never dress like that! They don’t even know the franchise!”
Of course someone pointed out that the outfit in question was from Mario kart (and is also extremely feminine anyway) and he claimed the extended, red-faced rant he went on was a “joke”. And that’s the biggest thing, he constantly commits to an extremely bad take then pretends it never happened or that he was joking, and just appears to think that no one can tell he’s full of shit? The overwhelming impression I get of the guy is that he is really not very clever, but thinks he is because he assumes everyone else is even less clever than he is.
It’s amazing how much of a tempest in a teapot they have managed to cook up. “Have you considered that Lia Thomas drew for fifth?! And Fallon Fox once inflicted injuries that sound disturbing but are actually very common in MMA? Sure, trans people have been allowed to compete in the Olympics since (iirc) 2004 and literally no trans woman has ever won gold, but they still obviously have major advantages!” It’s downright pathetic.
Ha! Yeah, I got the links mixed up. I thought that study was being used by chuds to support the opposite of the paper’s actual conclusion (wouldn’t be the first time)
I was looking at the wrong paper! Whoops. I was looking at the first one, linked by DragonBallZinn, “Body composition and physical fitness in transgender versus cisgender individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis”, and I think I just didn’t notice that the second one even existed.
Good to see some better science than that second piece of trash though.
Interesting that they still manage to come to the conclusion that trans women don’t have an advantage, then.
I’m not about to read the whole thing, but the conclusion includes “Current evidence […] does not support theories of inherent athletic advantages for transgender women over cisgender.”, what kind of junk science have they included?
I always love it when chuds use a source that explicitly disagrees with them:
“While transgender women exhibited higher lean mass than cisgender women, their physical fitness was comparable. Current evidence is mostly low certainty and has heterogenous quality but does not support theories of inherent athletic advantages for transgender women over cisgender.”
“Current evidence […] does not support theories of inherent athletic advantages for transgender women over cisgender.”
Wasn’t there a poll a few years ago carried out by like Harvard or Yale that showed that, like, 90% of Chinese people are happy with their government and feel that it is democratic and properly represents their interests?
It’s kinda striking how badass and hot all the scary antifa types are in this. Oh no, not a super buff, pretty lady with rainbow hair! The west has fallen.