

21·
4 days agoDon’t waste your time replying to NotAnOtter. If someone slings mud without taking a stance, they aren’t looking to debate, they’re looking to bicker. Good points, though.


Don’t waste your time replying to NotAnOtter. If someone slings mud without taking a stance, they aren’t looking to debate, they’re looking to bicker. Good points, though.


This rhetoric was used most notably by Reagan to dismantle the Community Services Administration, he argued the government couldn’t be trusted to tackle poverty.
Governments aren’t a single body; they’re a sum of the people you add to them. The people within them all have their own levers of power and things they wish to enact. When the government does something bad, do not shrug and say, “Well, of course the government did something bad,” take names, primary them out. Anything but blind cynicism.
Neat. Thanks for the info.
Still a weak argument in context. they laid out the pitfalls with the thinking and this only attacks the inference of the association.