Idk man, i only just heard about this from this article, but just reading through the article I can’t imagine anyone I would consider normal drowning, beating to death, then tying the dead puppy to the back of a motorcycle and dragging it through the wilderness. The article says alcohol was involved so I’d put my money on this guy being a violent piece of shit to begin with

I do agree with you completely. But it is worth noting this just says service dog which would imply a disability service dog as opposed to a police K-9 unit.

Awesome! That was going to be the next thing I looked up was how to do the snap list. It shouldn’t be impacting my libation as that is running in a docker instance managed by portainer. Though now that I think back I had initially installed libation using snap, but couldn’t get it to work, so perhaps I have both instances running and am trying to use the snap one on accident when I need to be opening the docker instance.

That makes sense, are they intended to persist indefinitely, only while the subject application is running, or do they go away after a period of time? Thanks for your help!

Oh okay, so do they go away on their own or do they persist potentially indefinitely? I have used snap in the past but had never noticed these until now. I guess I was just paranoid after the plex vulnerability news haha. Thanks.

I don’t know for certain that these unexpected devices in my disk manager are causing the issue, but I noticed them at the same time as the issue with libation being unable to access the directory it normally uses and so I may be conflating 2 unrelated issues

Okay, I have used snap to install things before but it never generated these faux disks that I can’t seem to delete. Would you guess that it is a temporary issue and a restart should resolve? (haven’t restarted yet because I have been using the audiobookshelf and plex and haven’t scheduled a maintenance window yet)

Minor rant incoming:

these dating apps are some of the most privacy hungry surveillance-capitalism honeypots out there. Not only is their entire business model predicated on keeping people on the app and hopeful the app will work, they’re commodifying human connection and playing a notable part in the erosion of traditional 3rd spaces.

To top it all off they have very aggressive and opaque automated bans that will ban you for posting a photo they don’t think you’re in, or for having an additional account or many other minor things (as well as plenty of harassment prevention measures that are totally understandable) but the problem is once you’re banned they will not tell you why so that people can’t reverse engineer ban criteria to skirt around it. But if you reach out to support for help all they will tell you is “I cannot tell you or help you until you send me your government id so I can verify your identity”. Like I already debased myself and submitted to the face scan they require in order to have a profile (so they can compare it to your photos and ban you if their automated facial recognition deems they don’t look enough like you), now I have to give them even more of my information to sell in order to get support for my account to resolve an issue purposefully caused by their automod, ridiculous.

TL;DR: surveillance capitalism creating problems to which the solution is to surrender more of your privacy for their shareholder value.

Not directed at you OP, just screaming into the void