Obviously, we’all are solving audio problems.

If you want another “unga-bunga” approach, you can use netcat:
On the player machine:

nc -l 1234 | mpv -

On the sender machine:

ffmpeg | nc 192.168.1.4 1234

Of course, you can use any unused port instead of 1234.

I’m sorry you are working in such conditions, I hope you get better management that actually understands how much data one person can process.

I’m not sure how your story is at all relevant to what I said.

I don’t have a driver’s license, I don’t live in the US, I don’t need one. The lead in gasoline example was just the first thing that came to mind that fit a “technology that is profitable and useful, but kills people” description. Please pay attention to the road while driving instead of perfoming mental math exercises.

I would also like to ask you to think about what exactly you are arguing for right now, as I’m starting to think that our understanding of the value of human life differs quite a bit.

Why the are you getting more text than you can physically review at your job? That sounds like a recipe for poor reviews. How are you sure LLMs are not missing anything if nobody actually has the time to read through all the text? Why does the text that gets to a developer contain logical mistakes in the first place? Back at my last job we had people assigned to collecting feature requests, talk them through with whoever wanted the feature implemented and produce proper specifications that developers would implement without wasting time on specifications containing garbage.

As does nearly every activity of life, both in human society and the natural world.

Yea, all people who drank water died. Not a very good argument. Most things don’t have a mental disorder named after them. If I leave a webpage with a calculator running unattended it won’t magically persuade a random visitor into commiting suicide. Webpages with LLM-powered chatbots are doing just that. You may choose to neglect it, but to me it sounds like adding lead to your gasoline. Yea, your car runs better. Are you sure it’s worth it, though?

If you are generating tests with an LLM, it’s not deterministic.

Also, have you actually read anything an LLM wrote that’s longer than a hundered words? It’s usually immediately obvious. In the open source world things I keep seeing are exchanges like this one. And Niri is a fairly good case with it’s maintainer actually reading the PRs and catching all the bullshit that an LLM spits out. Very often nowadays people will also do reviews with an LLM and this sort of stuff will just accumulate in the codebase with nobody to reject it.

But even if it was as useful as big tech paints it to be, I’ll always be against using it based purely on morals. There is an enormous number of issues in that regard, most importatnly LLMs literally kill people both directly and indirectly. Condoning the adoption of this technology is either being ignorant or misanthropic.

Wouldn’t it be just… writing code yourself? It’s just instead of writing what you want directly you are writing tests for it.

Huh, Nyaa says there is one person, but I can’t connect to them. I messaged the uploader, hopefully they’ll respond and start seeding or I can get it from them and seed myself.

For not so obscure stuff, Nyaa is great. Liking to specific titles is against the rules, though, plug the name into the searchbar yourself, please.