HelloThere

My sweet summer child, Reagan was Gen Me’s revolution. The post-war dream was replaced with Fuck You Got Mine.

I absolutely agree that it isn’t a local council’s place to dictate foreign policy. I’d also argue it isn’t the place of any UK party to declare exclusive support for a single state solution, that decision is for the people born on the land themselves.

The point I’m getting at is that if a party’s position is antiracism, and also that thing X is racist, I don’t understand why they would want to work with a party who supports thing X.

For example, I cannot see Labour or Greens making formal power sharing agreements with Reform, even if just to get the bins collected.

Why is this different?

Is bin collection more important than antiracism?

So collaboration with racists is ok as long as it advances non-race-related issues?

How is that intersectional, exactly?

Given that labour’s policy is for a two state solution, and the greens now classify that as Zionism, and that Zionism is racism, why would the greens want to be in coalition with a party they view as racist?