That still doesn’t prevent a company from having the option to use the code commercially. Whether they actually want to do it or not is a separate issue.

But how is requiring explicit approval (meaning it’s not something that is typically allowed) considered “permissive”?

Can someone please tell the owner of https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware that NetBSD does not in fact have a “Permissive AI Policy.”

Nothing in the GPL prevents software from being used commercially… why do you claim they are unable to?

NetBSD, the only OS where typing ldconfig instantly bricks your system without warning.

At least Haiku is actually daily drivable if your hardware is supported.