Tried to sanitize the image of the Saudi Royals

Yeah, especially since he’s best buddies with Tony “world’s youngest pedophile” Hinchcliffe- I was expecting him to go and be excited about it.

He hangs with literal racists, pedophiles, and nazis, and pretends he’s so above all of it. He’s so fucking awful.

So there are only a few options here:

1. Microsoft is lying, and this is an attack

2. They aren’t lying, and this just shows their infrastucture is dogshit.

3. They aren’t lying, and someone internal fucked up so bad it took out multiple countries e-mail

4. They are lying, it’s an attack, but it’s from their own AI agents

None of those options are a good look for Microsoft.

Correct- but anarchists are either 15 year olds, or completely mentally fried druggies. They don’t think that far ahead.

Your tears are delicious

Just let it all out- crying is good for the soul.

Another dissertation? I’m not reading that.

Cry more lol

I’m not the one writing paragraphs about my opinion that everyone else has already said is stupid. Cry more.

… I don’t think my interpretation makes me rigid or fundamentalist…

Correct- it makes you wrong 😆

Cry to someone that cares 😢

You haven’t made a point- you’ve been on an indignant rant to someone that doesn’t care.

Literally, you are the problem.

Exactly how I feel about you.

I am using the voting buttons as intended. For some reason that triggers you. Idk why you’re so convinced you’re right, but you have yet to give anything other than your opinion to justify it. Give a source of some kind to prove it, and others might agree. I know the source “I made it the fuck up,” is really hard to source properly, but do try.

Edit- Yes, you objectively are wrong.

I don’t need to, I’m not wrong

I mean, you objectively are wrong.

I don’t need Lemmy’s rules or documentation to dictate what I believe the spirit and intended purpose of a voting system should be.

Got it- so you just don’t understand social media, and because it doesn’t work the way YOU believe it should, everyone else is wrong.

You’re just wrong. No matter how many words you type- the voting button was NEVER meant for what you have described. It has ALWAYS been a personal “Like/Dislike” button. Find me ANYWHERE in the Lemmy rules that says otherwise. Oh, you can’t? Weird.

That doesn’t matter to this conversation. The point the guy made was “Upvotes and downvotes used to mean something! Now it’s just for disagreements!”

Which is objectively false. Those buttons have ALWAYS been there for agreement/disagreement. Nothing more, nothing less.

Upvotes and downvotes have increasingly become a measure of whether someone agrees or disagrees with an opinion, rather than whether a contribution is relevant, factual, constructive, or adds value to the discussion.

…That is literally what the voting buttons have always been for? If you like something, upvote it- if you dislike it, downvote it- if you don’t care, ignore it. What reality have you been living in?