• JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes, I don’t see why they think stopping a magnetic field to stop heating a pan is different than stopping a fire to stop heating a pan, it’s not like it’s still happening after it’s stopped.

      • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Don’t induction pans have these thick bottoms, which are simply more mass that needs to be heated up? That always took longer than gas with a thin pan for me.

        • Noxy@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          there is no such thing as “induction pans”. either a pan is made out of induction compatible metal or it isn’t. thickness of the bottom doesn’t really enter into it.

          • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yes but his point has some validity because you really need to use certain pans and pots with induction. When we got induction installed, we had to get rid of about half our pans, and only certain ones perform well.

            The whole “instant responsiveness” with induction is true in theory but less noticeable in practice. If anything, I notice it most when turning a pan OFF. You do get a very fast end to the heat output. And there isn’t even any residual conduction after that moment because the top is glass. On a gas stove the iron gratings you rest the pan on will continue bleeding heat into your food for a while.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              That doesn’t even make sense, why would a pan magically somehow not begin to heat up right away when it’s in a fluctuating magnetic field? That’s the whole reason it gets hot. With traditional electric, the coil takes time to heat up, which in turn takes time to heat up the pan. But with induction and gas, they’re both heating the pan right away as soon as they turn on, and stop heating the pan when they turn off.

          • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I guess? If you’re talking theoretical? But i actually cook, then it doesn’t really matter that a pan would theoretically be faster if it was able to be produced thinner?

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’m not talking about a theoretically different pan, you said you’re using a different pan for the gas stove than the induction one. If you’re changing something between the two, then it’s obviously different.

              That always took longer than gas with a thin pan for me