No, he was mentally ill. He just blamed women, and men, not liking him for the root of his illness, rather than realizing it was his illness that was the problem.
the problem with mental illness is people who are mentally ill often have a misconception of causality of their problems. they blame other folks for what is mostly going on inside themselves.
he was a folk hero among the insane incels, sort of like the unibomber was, or Luigi is now
There are always insane people who think violence is the answer to their grievances, who idealizing the ‘heroes’ who enacted that violence on their behalf.
No, he was mentally ill. He just blamed women, and men, not liking him for the root of his illness, rather than realizing it was his illness that was the problem.
the problem with mental illness is people who are mentally ill often have a misconception of causality of their problems. they blame other folks for what is mostly going on inside themselves.
brilliant. What was it he called himself? The supreme gentleman? Do people actually look up to him, or is it ironic?
he was a folk hero among the insane incels, sort of like the unibomber was, or Luigi is now
There are always insane people who think violence is the answer to their grievances, who idealizing the ‘heroes’ who enacted that violence on their behalf.
ehhhhhh I think otherwise innocent female university students aren’t really comparable to a greedy billionaire who actively made people’s lives worse.
The Unabomber is a case of “I agree with the motives, just not the actions”