the image linked to by the post is the Pangram LLM-detection report of paragraphs in the first screenshot below, reading “100% AI”. in lieu of alt text for the screenshots below, I suggest scrolling through @eicker@lemmy.world’s profile and https://lemmy.world/comment/26323310, which the screenshots are of. Look at the vote counts.
I’m not misrepresenting anything. If you take any model and just change the temperature a little bit (it’s a setting that controls the influence of the RNG) you can have wildly different output.
Different AI providers using the exact same model will have outputs so different using the same exact prompts you’d think they were in different universes.
They absolutely do not “have the same hallmarks.”
This stuff is benchmarked to absurd degrees every time a new model comes out. Just look it up already! You’re so obviously arguing from an ignorant position it’s silly.
You absolutely did. So much so that you didn’t even bother to explain yourself.
I don’t need to look up anything. It’s been shoved in my face for the last 5 years. You are so obviously arguing about nuances that don’t matter in reality and it’s ignorant and silly! Things like em-dashes, bullet points, and gargling the user’s balls are all signs that everyone who’s paying attention can quickly and easily recognize at this point.