• Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    At least you have a road that reaches diagonally across WA. If Alaska did it would take a lot longer than that

    • BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Alaska w/ an area of 1.7m sq/km or 663k sq/Freedom Units compared to Western Australia 2.5m sq/km or 975k sq/Freedom Units I’m not sure about that… But I suppose it’s possible.

      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s not about the overall area, it’s about the shape. Alaska has long legs. WA is very compact for its size.