• lauha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Are you saying adding 8ths, 16ths and 32nds is trivial and having 64th in my example made it unrealistic?

    • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m saying that if you knew what you were talking about you wouldn’t be working in 64ths in the first place. You picked 64ths because “hurr sure Americans dumb” and you know it.

      • lauha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I picked 64 because I don’t use imperial and I have no sense of scalw what makes sense as a fraction unit. A bit paranoid, aren’t you?

        • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I picked 64 because I don’t use imperial and I have no sense of scalw what makes sense as a fraction unit.

          Exactly

          A bit paranoid, aren’t you?

          Nope, just sick of arrogant Europeans acting like they’re experts on shit they don’t have the first clue about.

          • lauha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You come to a thread where people throw light hearted banter about each others’ measuring systems and you feel attacked by arrogant europeans. Sounds a lot like paranoia. Chill.