• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But they didn’t have texts in the 1800s

    Yes, this is what makes it a joke. Because the only difference is the format that’s changed, while the racial sensibilities are about the same.

    Chinese exclusionary act not anti scamming propaganda.

    Hey now, if you get to define your racist charicature in your own terms, don’t you think you should let them do so to? I’m sure the Workingmen’s Party of California would say that it’s just “anti-capitalist” propaganda, the capitalists being the ones who let those damn Chinese come in and take our jobs.

    Of course, it’s bullshit in both cases.

    I take it you’re a fan of Taiwan and its sovereignty then?

    What does Taiwan have to do with anything?

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “charicature” isn’t a word. You’re looking for caricature and not only can you not spell it but you clearly don’t know what it means. You posted a racist caricature, I did not. Everything else you’ve said is also false. Me asking “what do you mean” is bait and I figured you’d say dumb enough shit to embarrass yourself/.ml. congratulations, ya dun it.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            My mistake.

            You’re looking for caricature and not only can you not spell it but you clearly don’t know what it means.

            Well let’s see. Say you depict a Chinese person as

            1. A scammer

            2. Someone who gets so triggered at the mention of Taiwan that they drop everything else

            3. Someone who spells “fuck” like “fuk”

            I would say that that fits the definition pretty damn well.

            Everything else you’ve said is also false

            Ooh, neat line. Everything else you said is false too. Real time saver.

            • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I mean yeah if you’re making your own definitions up for words you can call anything anything lmfao. China Post has been used in massive numbers to commit scams/fraud. The joke is rooted in reality because this has been happening recently. Anyone with a brain knows all Chinese people aren’t scammers. That same brain haver would recognize the silly aspect that they spell a word like parcel/arrive correctly then misspell fuck.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 hours ago

                China Post has been recently used in massive numbers to commit scams/fraud. The joke is rooted in reality because this has been happening recently.

                Oh, I see. Your position is that it’s not a stereotype, on the basis that Chinese people really are scammers.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    The sentence after that was the one where you maintained plausible deniability. Which is, I suppose, one other thing that’s different. You’re a bit more mask-on than the 1800’s racists were.

                    The punchline is still racism though.