• regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I want to visit west Taiwan one day, or as some people call it: “China”.

  • LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you respect China, you’re a piece of shit. Taiwan deserves independence, Hong Kong does too, so does Tibet, and so does East Turkestan.

    This is helping me filter people. These are true beliefs I hold and if you give me the “MUH TIBET HAD SLAVERY” thing, good job you bought into propeganda.

    I eat ass.

    • Logi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you respect China

      China as a country, a people and a culture deserve respect. The current power structure doesn’t.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      These are true beliefs I hold and if you give me the “MUH TIBET HAD SLAVERY” thing, good job you bought into propeganda.

      I mean, so did almost literally everyone else to some degree, unless they went extinct as hunter-gatherers. If that’s your disqualifier, you need to go live with the penguins in Antarctica.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The argument isn’t that Tibet once had slavery at some point in it’s history, but that Tibet had slavery up until the PRC ended it. There are no states in the modern day that practice slavery or serfdom in a comparable way (you could argue things like “wage slavery,” but that’s still significantly different from chattel slavery or serfdom). Slave states do not have the right to exist, and any nation without slaves has the right to invade a slave state and free the slaves. That’s not an unreasonable standard, it’s a standard that exists today.

        • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          any nation without slaves has the right to invade a slave state and free the slaves.

          This one doesn’t ring well. It is one thing if the oppressed people themselves asked for help, but otherwise its just an invasion. No nation has a ‘right’ to free slaves.

        • Kiernian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          any nation without slaves has the right to invade a slave state and free the slaves.

          If you believe that’s objectively true then I suspect you need to ask yourself “why aren’t governments everywhere banding together to obliterate the actual slavery going on inside their borders?”

          Those discord user account compromises and social media accounts asking for gift cards to avoid releasing your personal whatever aren’t legitimate businesses and the people performing those actions for them are not free to quit or even leave the buildimg they “work” in.

          Okay, you could maybe argue that’s one-off tourist kidnapping by criminal parties at scale, but then we have blood diamonds. How is it they still exist?

          Vegas hotels getting regular visits from cops as the drugs wear off early and the occasional girl escapes from the room she’s being held in, the fact that the superbowl is the world’s largest human trafficking conference, large portions of haiti under the current regime, slavery is EVERYWHERE and whoever is feeding you that line and placing the onus at a governmental policy level is trying to distract you from reality and hand-wave away anything that doesn’t line up with their own agenda.

          The world banded rogether to eliminate CFC’s because of the ozone hole.

          It’s clear we CAN all cooperate, so I posit you should be asking yourself: when reality doesn’t line up with the convenient point-proving “statements of fact” someone is pushing your direction, what does someone stand to gain from misrepresenting reality with quotable sound bytes?

  • Miisha ♀️@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Damn. I know this is a shitpost (and a funny one) but this is actually a neat strategy as a rough filter for bad people, like on dating sites or such.
    I think I’ll start using this. Thank you OP! <3

  • rhinestones@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Grateful for my blessings and blessed to give back, I’m giving 35 grand to anyone who messages “GRACE” on Telegram @Georgestones12, I understand that many people are struggling with bills, and I want to help reduce that burden. It’s a season of love, kindness, and blessings.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      .ml memes be like:

      Uyghurs deserve to be genocided because terrorism.

      Or

      Ukraine are nazis and deserve to be genocided by Russia.

      While somehow still saying democrats are the genociders.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean that the fake texts with intentionally bad spelling stereotyping Chinese people acting like a racist charicature is similar to the racial charicatures of the 1800s, was that unclear?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            I’m not sure how that has anything to do with anything I said.

            The texts werent even a character. Your claims of racial stereotyping are absurd.

            Lmao. Yes, the Chinese scammer breaking character at the mention of Taiwan to say “Fuk you,” definitely not a charicature or stereotype and it’s totally absurd to suggest it.

            What’s next? Just start making jokes like full on, “Me so horny, me love you long time?”

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                7 hours ago

                What do you mean? Taiwan is independent for all intents and purposes, but is not, nor if I’m not mistaken does it claim to be, formally an independent country. I acknowledge that reality, yes.

            • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The joke is expressedly about china not accepting taiwan as a country.

              Fuk you, .ml pig. <— satire demonstrating anyone can be hateful in this way.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 hours ago

                No, it’s not about “China” not accepting Taiwan as a country, because “China” does not typically engage in text messages, seeing as it’s not a person.

                It’s about a stereotypical Chinese person acting and speaking in a way that the person who created the fake texts decided to make them. Which is, first trying to scam people, then being so triggered by the mention of Taiwan that they break character, then misspelling a word in a stereotypical way.

                Taiwan is just how you justify the rest of it to yourself.

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          But they didn’t have texts in the 1800s and that’s a political cartoon used to support the Chinese exclusionary act. I think you may be confused. I take it you’re a fan of Taiwan and its sovereignty then?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 hours ago

            But they didn’t have texts in the 1800s

            Yes, this is what makes it a joke. Because the only difference is the format that’s changed, while the racial sensibilities are about the same.

            Chinese exclusionary act not anti scamming propaganda.

            Hey now, if you get to define your racist charicature in your own terms, don’t you think you should let them do so to? I’m sure the Workingmen’s Party of California would say that it’s just “anti-capitalist” propaganda, the capitalists being the ones who let those damn Chinese come in and take our jobs.

            Of course, it’s bullshit in both cases.

            I take it you’re a fan of Taiwan and its sovereignty then?

            What does Taiwan have to do with anything?

                • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  “charicature” isn’t a word. You’re looking for caricature and not only can you not spell it but you clearly don’t know what it means. You posted a racist caricature, I did not. Everything else you’ve said is also false. Me asking “what do you mean” is bait and I figured you’d say dumb enough shit to embarrass yourself/.ml. congratulations, ya dun it.