By 2019, China’s central authorities were stating explicitly that they were not happy with the idea. They issued formal clarifications that scores could not be used to penalize citizens and that only formal legal documents could serve as grounds for penalties. Pilot cities quickly followed suit: Wenzhou, having made ambitious plans in 2014, made a full 180 degrees and in 2019 released an encouragement-only scheme instead. Rongcheng issued a revision in 2021 that required voluntary application and could only issue rewards. Many other scoring plans never materialized at all.
I’ve quite literally linked the conclusion of the article you linked while you continue to cherry pick in order to drive home your point (which the article not only disproves but eclipses with a different, more critical issue: the mass surveilance systems that already exist independently of SoCS in China).
The only people here that are delusional are you and the people upvoting you.
Totally ignoring the conclusions in the article that you linked. I’d say I’m surprised but you’re a .mler - this is about what I expect.
???
It barely made it out of the testing phase, lol
Perpetually failing to engage with the point, what a surprise.
Honestly I can’t tell if you’re being serious, that’s how wild this take is.
I’ve quite literally linked the conclusion of the article you linked while you continue to cherry pick in order to drive home your point (which the article not only disproves but eclipses with a different, more critical issue: the mass surveilance systems that already exist independently of SoCS in China).
The only people here that are delusional are you and the people upvoting you.
Lol. Okay buddy